homecloud.gif

pfSense + 1 Public IP = Home Cloud

Home Cloud Graphic
[Update: As mentioned in Trail Log #66 I've rethought this project and will be looking at alternatives.]

Now that I’ve ben running pfSense for a problem-free month it’s time to start using it for more than cool charts and graphs. My first goal is to be able to make multiple servers available from the internet. I’ve got Windows Home Server v1 and Windows Home Server 2011 servers running and ready to go. Once those are going I’ll want to add my development web server to the mix so I can do development and testing from outside the home. I’ve spent some time testing various options and I’ve settled on a solution that I think will work. At least all the individual pieces work, time to see if they fit together.

The main obstacle for me is that I have one public IP which needs to address the various internal servers. Those internal servers run the same services on the same ports. The nature of NAT port forwarding is all traffic coming into the WAN connection for a port gets forwarded to the same computer. I can’t parse port 80 (http/web) traffic and make a decision where it needs to go. This is the major obstacle. Another minor issue is that my public IP is dynamic and can change whenever Comcast wants to change it. (Although when I want it to change it’s surprisingly hard to do).

Another requirement is that I use my own domain, and not just a subdomain of some DDNS provider.

One problem I have, with no real solution, is that my home servers may not be accessible from sites behind a proxy server or firewall. Such as the office I work in for my day job. The proxy server will only pass ports 80 and 443 out of the office. So what I’ll end up doing is picking my main server and set it up to be accessed using port 80 and 443 as normal. The other servers won’t be accessible from my office. (A home VPN connection will be a future project.)

I’ll get into the specific configuration details in later articles but I’ve decided on the following approach:

  1. I’ll be using DNS-O-Matic to handle the dynamic DNS updates. This is a free service from the OpenDNS people, although an account is required.
  2. My DNS provider is DNS Made Easy. I’ve used them for a few years and they’re reasonably priced and reliable. They do support Dynamic DNS updates so I’ll use them.
  3. I’ll use pfSense of course. Rather than change the ports my servers use I’ll map a unique incoming port to the standard port used by the appropriate server. For example, traffic coming in to my WAN on port 8081 will go to port 80 on my Server 1. Incoming traffic on port 8082 will go to port 80 on my server 2. So I’ll have to remember what port redirects to which server but there’s no configuration changes needed on the server. I’ll be using pfSense 2 but pfSense 1.3 may work too as it seems to have all the features I use.

The basic steps I’ll be taking are:

  1. Map out what services I want to use, what port I want to use to access them externally, and what server and port they run on in my house.
  2. Setup pfSense so it can find the servers and add some aliases so I don’t get confused or have to remember IP addresses.
  3. Configure dynamic DNS so my DNS provider learns about the new IP address when I get it from my ISP.
  4. Add port forwarding and firewall rules to handle the port forwarding mapped out in step 1.
  5. Test and fix my mistakes.

I had wanted to handle this from within pfSense but my DNS provider (DNS Made Easy) isn’t directly supported and the RFC 2136 method won’t work either. I’m not willing to use a different DNS service. I did find references to add code to pfSense in order to add DNS Made Easy support. I decided against this to avoid forgetting about it and overwriting the code in a pfSense update. I also didn’t want to worry about a change breaking the code. While a third party service is one more thing that can break, it seemed the least problematic.

I also looked at changing the ports used by Windows Home Server. While I did find some write-ups on how to do this for version 1 there were caveats. WHS 2011 seemed to be more problematic and changing ports would break other features, My own brief test to change the port on WHS 2011 was a failure. Keeping the default ports on the servers and remapping them with pfSense seems to be a clean solution. I will need to remember to include the port in the URL, but other than that it’s pretty basic and worked in my testing, There might be some features that won’t be accessible but I haven’t found them yet.

Since I have only one public IP address and I’m using the port to map to the correct server I don’t really need to set each server up in DNS. I could use one name and then pick the server via the port, But I’ll use names anyway as it will make changes easier and help me keep things straight. It will also make life easier if I get more public IPs.

Finally, I’ll be testing using my cell network so as to access the servers externally. Testing from within the home isn’t useful and adds its own set of problems. I won’t be breaking access from within my house, but it won’t be a good way to test external access. pfSense has some security settings that kick in if it detects a private IP address as the source on the WAN port.

Now it’s time to start putting it together. I’ll use this post as a central repository with links to my other articles and resources on this topic so you can check back here to see everything on the topic I’ll call “Home Cloud”. I’ll be starting off by setting up two Windows Home Servers, a vernon 1 server and an 2011 server.

The place to start is with my pfSense 2.0 installation back in early October.

2 thoughts on “pfSense + 1 Public IP = Home Cloud

  1. Jared

    I used an Alteon back when Nortel Networks owned them, now Radware owns them, but we could configure what we called Layer 7 forwarding.

    While port forwarding switches on the port, Layer7 forwarding switches on the URL.

    You configure any tcp session that starts with http://server1.domain.tld to go server1, http://server2.domain.tld to go to server2. Then that entire TCP session would continue to go to that server.

    Anyway, i tseems like pfSense should have this feature since I learned about it in 02 a decade ago.

    Like

    1. ray Post author

      @Jared – pfSense can’t do layer 7 routing but now that you’ve mentioned it – Untangle, wich I’ve used in the past works on layer 7 so it can probably route based on the URL so I’m going to check that out. Thanks.

      Like

Comments are closed.